Skip to Content

Vouchers and School Choice

Vouchers and School Choice

Tell your elected leaders to say "NO" to vouchers!

Families want public school choice, not tax deductions for private school tuition.

During the 2013 legislative session, The SCEA is pursuing legislation that achieves three big reforms for our public schools:

1) make SC public school system the most choice-driven public school system in the nation;

2) make SC’s system of teacher evaluation the most professional and effective in the nation and

3) make SC teacher salaries the most competitive in the Southeast.

In planning our strategy this summer, The SCEA asked Abacus Associates to survey South Carolinians to see which proposal had more support: 1) the governor’s proposal supporting tax deductions for families choosing to send their children to private, religious, or home schools, or to public schools outside their district; or 2) The SCEA proposal which would provide families the opportunity to have public school choice within and across districts.

Abacus Associates is a public opinion research firm with over 20 years’ experience conducting surveys in nearly every state of the country as well as internationally.

The results of the survey are clear. When South Carolinians are asked which of the two proposals they prefer, they overwhelmingly choose The SCEA’s public school choice over the tax deduction proposal by a ratio of nearly three-to-one (68% to 24%).

When we break out results for public school parents, support for public school choice over tax deductions is even more overwhelming (86% to 13%).

So the public has chosen public school choice, not tax deductions for private school tuition.

In the 2012 legislative session, the governor and state superintendent opposed our bill because it did not provide tax deductions for families choosing to send their children to private, religious, or home schools. This year, The SCEA is again advocating for a public school choice bill—a bill we know parents support almost seven to one and voters support nearly three to one. We’re urging legislators to acknowledge the voice of the people.

Five Talking Points on Vouchers

"What have you got against private school vouchers?" your brother-in-law demands over Sunday dinner. Ah, if he only knew the facts. Next time someone puts you on the spot, use these talking points to debunk the most popular voucher claims.

  • Fact: There's no link between vouchers and gains in student achievement. There's no conclusive evidence that vouchers improve the achievement of students who use them to attend private school. Nor is there any validity to claims that, by creating a "competitive marketplace" for students, vouchers force public schools to improve. In fact, the most dramatic improvements in student achievement have occurred in places where vouchers do not exist — such as Texas, North Carolina, Connecticut and Chicago. Instead, those states and communities focused on teacher quality and extra help for students who need it.
  • Fact: Vouchers undermine accountability for public funds. Private schools have almost complete autonomy with regard to how they operate: who they teach, what they teach, how they teach, how — if at all — they measure student achievement, how they manage their finances, and what they are required to disclose to parents and the public. The absence of public accountability for voucher funds has contributed to rampant fraud, waste and abuse in current voucher programs.
  • Fact: Vouchers do not reduce public education costs. Actually, they increase costs, by requiring taxpayers to fund two school systems, one public and one private.
  • Fact: Vouchers do not give parents real educational choice. Participating private schools may limit enrollment, and in many cases may maintain exclusive admissions policies and charge tuition and fees far above the amount provided by the voucher. Unlike public schools, private and religious schools can — and do — discriminate in admissions on the basis of prior academic achievement, standardized test scores, interviews with applicants and parents, gender, religion, income, special needs, and behavioral history.
  • Fact: The public disapproves of vouchers. By overwhelming margins, Americans prefer improving their public schools to spending scarce tax dollars on voucher programs. Since 1966, vouchers or voucher-related measures have been placed before voters in 13 states and the District of Columbia 22 times. With the lone exception of South Dakota — which approved the provision of textbooks to parochial schools in 1986 — voters have rejected public aid to private and religious schools every time. In those 22 elections, nearly two out of three voters cast "no" votes.

The SCEA SPEAKS: School Reform that Works? Yes! Vouchers at Tax-Payers Expense? No!

NEA SPEAKS: NEA Voucher Page




E-mail your members of Congress:


SC Voucher News

SC Has Something to Teach Us

PBS: School Vouchers Overview

Embed This Page (x)

Select and copy this code to your clipboard