Skip Navigation
We use cookies to offer you a better browsing experience, provide ads, analyze site traffic, and personalize content. If you continue to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies.
Testimony

VOTE NO on Senate private school voucher scheme (S.935)

The majority of students—over 94% of South Carolina’s students—go to Public Schools. Vouchers cost our students by sending public dollars to private schools, schools that can discriminate.
Submitted on: January 18, 2022

January 18, 2022

Senate Education Subcommittee

S.935 – Opponent Testimony

Chair Massey and members of the Senate Education Subcommittee on S.935,

Thank you for this opportunity to provide testimony in opposition to S.935. I am Sherry East, President of The South Carolina Education Association.

The SCEA opposes S.935 and Education Scholarship Account Vouchers. Vouchers cost our students by taking taxpayer dollars from Public Schools to send students to private schools.

The majority of students—over 94% of South Carolina’s students—go to Public Schools. When money leaves our Public Schools to cover private school vouchers, consequences for the many students who remain include larger class sizes, reduced arts and extracurricular opportunities, and fewer sports programs. In addition, if many students who qualify leave, it could even threaten Title Funding in a school or district.

As a high school Science teacher, I am proud to provide the best possible education for all students. Public Schools educate all students without discrimination, while the private schools accepting vouchers can pick and choose their students. These schools can deny students on the basis of disability, behavior, language spoken at home, religion, and more.

In particular, with this bill, the choice of some families to use a private school voucher directly takes public dollars from the local Public School. According to our state constitution, public dollars should never be used for private schools.

Further, if student returns to public schools after taking a voucher, the money doesn’t “follow the student” back to the Public School. This means that Public Schools would essentially end up paying twice for these voucher-return students.

However, the most important thing to remember is the reason we’re all here today. All students deserve to receive a high-quality education. Expanding vouchers will take public money from public schools and the majority of South Carolina’s students who attend and will continue to attend Public Schools. Voucher schemes like S.935 hurt the ability for us to educate all students.

Vouchers are untested, unaccountable, unaffordable, and unconstitutional. They are dangerous for Public Schools. For these reasons, I urge you to oppose S.935.  

Sherry East, President of The South Carolina Education Association

Logo

Your Voice. Our Power. Their Future.

The SCEA is an affiliate of the largest professional association of educators in the country. As the leading advocate for the schools South Carolina students deserve, The SCEA works to promote quality public education and to support public school employees.